National Library of Serbia

Belgrade, Serbia · Member ID: 1078 · 61,161 total works

Global Rank

#2,973

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 11%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2971CSIRO Publishing(36 pts)#2972Elsevier BV(36 pts)#2974American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA)(36 pts)#2975University of Veterinary Sciences Brno(36 pts)

Nexus Score

36/ 100

+16 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,068

6,113 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,973

55,048 works

Ranked #3,068 for recent publications vs #2,973 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.5 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

4.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

2.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.8 / 20

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	91%	13.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	54%	10.8 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	10%	1.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	10%	1.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	94%	6.5 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 10% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 39% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

National Library of Serbia

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Full-Text URLs

Add Funder Information

Enable Crossmark

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results