Universidad del Valle

Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia · Member ID: 10728 · 13,176 total works

Global Rank

#2,821

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2819Universidad Surcolombiana(37 pts)#2820Strategic Public Management Journal(37 pts)#2822Ailamazyan Program Systems Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (PSI RAS)(37 pts)#2823Institut Agama Islam Ma arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung(37 pts)

Nexus Score

37/ 100

+23 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,913

1,119 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,821

12,057 works

Ranked #1,913 for recent publications vs #2,821 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

8.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.3 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.9 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	31	F	47%	18%	0%	0%	78%
Monographs	13	F	7%	25%	0%	0%	29%
Reference Books	13	F	12%	20%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	10	F	15%	10%	0%	0%	21%
Reports	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Books	1	F	2%	1%	0%	0%	1%
Book Chapters	1	F	0%	5%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	64%	9.7 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	78%	3.9 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	80%	4.0 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	68%	13.6 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	3%	0.3 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	79%	5.5 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	79%	5.5 / 7	Good
Abstracts access	88%	5.3 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+8 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 40% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universidad del Valle

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results