MGIMO University

Moscow, Russia · Member ID: 10454 · 6,048 total works

Global Rank

#2,241

of 28,259

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2239Journal of Tourism Theory and Research(40 pts)#2240Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)(40 pts)#2242Fundacao Municipal de Educacao e Cultura de Santa Fe do Sul(40 pts)#2243The Daesoon Academy of Sciences(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+13 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,536

854 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,241

5,194 works

Ranked #2,536 for recent publications vs #2,241 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

11.6 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

6.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

17.5 / 20

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	36	D	44%	18%	23%	0%	90%
Monographs	6	F	0%	0%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Why doesn't the leaderboard use per-type scores? Deciding which content types count as "primary research" is subjective and varies by discipline and publisher model. The leaderboard uses Crossref's aggregate coverage to ensure a consistent, comparable baseline across all 27,000+ publishers. This per-type breakdown lets you see the full picture for any individual publisher.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	81%	12.2 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	15%	0.7 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	59%	11.8 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	82%	4.1 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	83%	5.8 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	83%	5.8 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	95%	5.7 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+9 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 46% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve People

+9 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

MGIMO University

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve People

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Similarity Check

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results