Universidad de Valladolid

Valladolid, Spain · Member ID: 10298 · 5,077 total works

Global Rank

#4,032

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 14%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#4030Uzhhorod National University(32 pts)#4031Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen(32 pts)#4033Revista Latino-Americana de Marcapasso e Arritmia(32 pts)#4034Cadernos de Fe e Cultura, Oculum Ensaios, Reflexao, Revista de Ciencias Medicas e Revista de Educacao da PUC-Campinas(32 pts)

Nexus Score

31/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#5,030

1,417 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#4,032

3,660 works

Ranked #5,030 for recent publications vs #4,032 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

4.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.9 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

16.9 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	33	F	20%	39%	9%	0%	93%
Edited Books	16	F	0%	50%	0%	0%	30%
Monographs	6	F	0%	1%	0%	0%	30%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	88%	4.4 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	51%	10.1 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	33%	1.6 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	25%	2.5 / 10	Needs Work
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	89%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	88%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	82%	5.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+16 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 17% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 14% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universidad de Valladolid

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

Increase ORCID Coverage

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results