OMF Publishing

Kyiv, Ukraine · Member ID: 10076 · 427 total works

Global Rank

#5,928

of 28,379

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5926Open Science Journal(26 pts)#5927International Journal of Librarianship(26 pts)#5929Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung(26 pts)#5930Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Pathology(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+2 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#7,466

91 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,928

336 works

Ranked #7,466 for recent publications vs #5,928 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

7.3 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

8.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	38%	5.8 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	23%	1.1 / 5	Needs Work
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	44%	8.8 / 20	Needs Work
Affiliations (Text) organizations	44%	2.2 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	12%	1.2 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	77%	5.4 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	42%	2.5 / 6	Needs Work

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+13 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 29% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

OMF Publishing

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Similarity Check

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results